|
|
Case Studies
TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Distribution Study
Technique identifies design flaw
In the development of a new reactor design for a speciality
chemical process, engineers spent considerable time debating
methods for the rapid mixing of the reactants and the subsequent
flow distribution throughout the reactor. Product yield
and quality depended on the degree of mixing, so a sophisticated
baffle arrangement was chosen to insure that no stagnant
regions would occur in the reactor. During the start-up
it became evident that the reactor was unable to achieve
either the theoretical yield or even those demonstrated
in the pilot plant. After eliminating many alternative reasons
for the poor yield, engineers suspected inadequate mixing
in the reactor, despite the care taken during the design
stage. Tracerco was called in to perform a mixing and flow
distribution study on the reactor as part of the investigation
of the problem.

Using the TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Distribution
Study, a small amount of an organic radioisotope liquid
was injected into one of the reactant streams. The form
of the isotope was chosen to be non-reactive in the process.
It would follow the flow patterns of the fluids in the reactor.
Twelve external detectors were mounted strategically around
the reactor, plus one at the inlet and one on the product
exit pipe. These inlet and exit detectors provided information
about the residence time in the reactor. The shape of the
exit curve was used to determine the mixing characteristics
as defined by stirred tank equivalents (STE). The twelve
detectors mounted around the reactor provided information
about flow distribution through the reactor. By careful
calibration of these detectors their responses can be compared
to clearly indicate any bias in the flow throughout the
reactor. The results of the test showed that the reactor
had a 20 second mean residence time and that good mixing
was occurring in the reactor, as indicated by the STE value
of 1.2. However, the twelve detectors placed around the
vessel did not have similar responses. The pattern was such
that the front end of the reactor was not being effectively
used, probably caused by the way the reactant streams were
introduced. The inlet reactor baffles were redesigned to
use the whole vessel more effectively, resulting in an increase
in the product yield to the expected level. The process
was then successfully commissioning to the design specifications.
<< back
|