| Case Studies
TRACERCO
Diagnostics™ Tower Scan
A major pharmaceutical plant contacted Tracerco regarding
an operational problem on a separation tower operating on
a batch process. The tower consisted of a single bed of
structured packing and approximately 5 hours into the batch
a high-pressure drop continually developed, tripping the
tower out. This resulted in extended batch times and therefore
a reduction in the total production capacity of the plant.
The company requested a TRACERCO Diagnostics™ Tower
Scan to examine the bed section for mal-distribution, which
the client thought was the most likely reason for their
problems. When the Tracerco Engineers arrived on site the
tower was at the end of a batch and this gave them the opportunity
to perform a virtual, “ off line” scan. The
results (see Fig. 1 - black line), confirmed that the bed
was correctly located and had a similar density to the engineering
specification.
"On-line" scans were then performed during the
next batch and it was agreed that a four “grid line”
scan would provide the most useful information for a mal-distribution
study. However, during the first scan
the high pressure drop condition was reached and the tower
tripped. The scan continued however, and it showed that
the tower was flooding from the bottom of the vessel to
an elevation of around 1000mm, actually inside the bed itself.
This was very different to what was expected as it clearly
showed that the tower was flooding from its base rather
than the bottom of the bed, thus indicating that the problem
was in the exit line from the tower base rather than the
bed itself. Further scans were performed before the tower
was re-started and then when it was back on-line. All of
the scans indicated a level build-up was developing from
the tower base up to elevations within the bed.
After the measurements were performed, our client undertook
an initial visual inspection of the vessel and it revealed
no restriction within the line and confirmed the control
valve was operating satisfactorily and after the inspection
the problem disappeared. Three weeks after the inspection
the problem reappeared and the client had no idea why it
was occurring again. Further analysis of plant data was
performed and this revealed that the batches, which had
been produced before the problem reappeared, had been allowed
to cool. The client concluded that this resulted in the
formation of a solids build-up in the exit pipe of the tower,
leading to a blockage and causing the flooding.
The trace heating duty on the line was increased by a
small percentage and to our knowledge there are no longer
any high-pressure drop trip outs on the batch reactor, leading
to a much greater production throughput.
Overall, as a result of solving the problem, the batch
time has been decreased from 22 to 14 hours together.
<< back
|